By way of a reminder, here is the Renovo Aerowood:
I also note that Renovo has now quoted me on the product page:
Five months later I still stand by that sentiment, though it does sound a little creepy out of context.
Anyway, apart from changing the saddle from a Selle Italia whatever-was-on-there to a Fizik (sorry, "F:i;//;%zi@k") whatever-it-is, I'm still riding the bike exactly as I received it:
Of course, there's a huge difference between even a long and challenging ride you undertake at your own pace and an race where you're pushing the bike as hard as you can, and for this I happen to believe that it's impossible to evaluate a bike like this without racing on it. Does it feel stable when you're millimeters away from the wheel in front of you, or when exertion has robbed you of your finesse? Are there quirks that only reveal themselves in the heat of battle? Odd cable routings or poorly-placed braze-ons? Basically, a bicycle's character comes into sharp relief when you're toiling atop it, and evaluating a racing-type bike without actually racing on it is like testing out a pair of sunglasses at the mall: they may seem okay, but you don't really know anything until you hit the beach.
As it happens, I've recently relapsed and after a multi-year hiatus have been tentatively dipping my Sidis into the tepid waters of amateur bicycle racing again. In fact, the Renovo is partially responsible for my relapse, since riding a swoopy aero bike with crabon wheels and electronic shifting made me think to myself, "It sure would be fun to race this thing." And so this very morning I headed down to Central Park and did just that.
This was my second race of the season, and as you may recall for my first race I opted to ride the Ritte Rust Bucket:
You may also recall that I got dropped, since jumping into the pack after a lengthy absence was a bit of a shock to the system. This time around I was somewhat more prepared, at least psychologically. I also opted for the Masters race due to the shorter distance and more genteel pace, though this was somewhat offset by the much smaller field which offered me no real place to hide. The upshot of all of this is that while I was nowhere near the pointy end of things, I did ultimately complete the allotted number of laps alongside more than one other rider from my field, so I'm going to go ahead and call this go-round a skin-of-the-teeth "pass."
So now let's talk about the Renovo, of which I have no race-day photos because my phone died, so instead here's a picture of a woodpile:
Granted, this was only one race outing (and a particularly undistinguished one at that), but overall it performed very favorably as a race bike. While I'd opted for the Ritte last time because I thought it might feel more stable, my concerns turned out to be unfounded and the Renovo inspired confidence beneath my scranular region at all times. I also like the components much more in a racing context. For example, consider the handlebars, which I don't have a photo of, but which I believe are these:
While I prefer my old-fashioned round-tubed handlebars for everyday riding, it turns out these weird nooks and bulges feel great when you're racing. Furthermore, as flawless as the electronic shifting is, until today my impression has been, "Sure, it's really nice, but it's not that big a deal." Now that I've raced on it however I totally think it is a big deal, because when you're clinging to the wheel in front of you for dear life like I generally am you really appreciate how amazingly consistent the electronic shifting is. I'm not saying this translates into any meaningful performance benefits, but I am saying it feels really good--kind of like someone's kissing your hands every time you shift. Also, you're probably a hell of a lot less likely to drop a chain with it, though Central Park is pretty much a big-ring course.
Of course, you can put fancy components on any bike. Here's the real question: Is there anything inherent in the Renovo's woodiness that makes it perform well? I dunno. I do know the bike felt fast, and that going forward I'd choose it over the Ritte for my Fred races. I also know this is what Renovo says about wood:
Renovos have an unequaled smooth ride. This is because vibration is absorbed by the wood itself, enhanced by our designs where appropriate.
Hey, my experiences with the bike don't contradict this, though whether it's because of the wood or because it's a well-fitting bike with lots of fancy parts on it is anybody's guess. (I will say the bike felt pretty much the same with cheap metal wheels on it, so maybe the wood is in fact magical, but as a rule there are three things I'm very leery about putting faith in: divine beings; helmets; and frame materials.)
And in case you think I'm being disingenuous in expressing pleasure at riding an expensive bicycle, I can assure you that while it is indeed a lot of fun to ride it ain't perfect. Consider, for example, this:
That is the bicycle's only bottle cage mount. Firstly, it seems odd to me to bill something as an "endurance" bike and then equip it with only one bottle mount. Secondly, while I like my bottle in the seat tube cage for more casual riding, when I'm splayed out over the bars in a race-type situation it's much easier to reach down and grab a bottle off the downtube, so being forced to keep it here was annoying. And while it remains to be seen whether or not I'll find myself fit enough this summer to contest any hot two-bottle races, carrying a pair of bottles certainly is something your racing bike should allow you to do.
So that's where we stand so far, but rest assured there's lots more testing to come. And while I'm a long way from drawing any conclusions about this bicycle, I think we can all agree that in many ways a $10,000 hunk of wood is perhaps the quintessential Masters bike, and that the only way I could have out-Mastered myself this morning would have been by taking it home on the back of a Porsche Boxster.
from Bike Snob NYC https://ift.tt/2Gm6MgM
No comments:
Post a Comment